Songwriting versus Teaching

My daughter and I were having a discussion about which changed more lives, songwriting or teaching?  Good teaching has a pyramid-like effect, especially if you teach prospective teachers.  Your students go out and teach others, who may end up teachers themselves and teach others.  Sometimes you can see the effect almost immediately.  Once I was teaching a course called “Writing in the Schools.”  The students were all pre-service teachers, but some were going to teach grammar school, some high school, some college.  I was teaching a book by Jerome Harste called Language Stories, Literacy Lessons, which is a longitudinal study of pre-school literacy.  Harste and his team found that pre-school kids engage in all sorts of pre-literate behavior.  They know that writing is different from drawing and they can recognize a McDonald’s from way down the street because they can read the logo.  They often can recognize and name some letters in the alphabet, and they are often excited about literacy.  However, when they get to kindergarten, teachers usually ignore all these abilities and make them begin writing carefully-shaped letters exactly between the lines.  One student described in the Harste book went into Kindergarten saying “I can write!” and after the first week said “I can’t write.”

A student who was working as a teacher’s aid in a kindergarten class added my class late, so she missed the first lecture.  As I signed her add form, she said, “My students can’t do anything.  They can’t read or write, or follow simple instructions.”  The next week, after she had read about half of the Harste book, she said, “My students are doing all of these things, but their teacher won’t accept it.  She tells them to fill out something with a green crayon, and they use all different colors, so they fail.”

That teacher is undoubtedly in a classroom somewhere today, and it is likely that her kindergarten students are writing and reading much better than others because she is working with natural pre-literate behaviors instead of against them.   Good teaching has a magnifying, multiplying effect.

Most pop music is entertaining fluff.  It’s a pleasure, but it doesn’t have much substance or ideological content.  When I first started listening to L.A. rock radio, KRLA and KFWB, the number one song was “I Got You Babe” by Sonny and Cher.  There is not much to think about in songs like that.  “Yesterday” by the Beatles was popular.  It has a pretty melody and a lot of pathos, but there is not much for the mind.  The first song that had a profound impact on me on multiple levels was Bob Dylan’s “Like a Rolling Stone.”   Imagine hearing “I Got You Babe” followed by this:

Once upon a time you dressed so fine
You threw the bums a dime in your prime, didnt you?
Peopled call, say, beware doll, youre bound to fall
You thought they were all kiddin you
You used to laugh about
Everybody that was hangin out
Now you dont talk so loud
Now you dont seem so proud
About having to be scrounging for your next meal.

To a seventh grader listening to pop music, that sounds real. It sounds wise and experienced. It’s a gritty fairy tale with a moral point. Don’t get too smug or comfortable, don’t be high and mighty, because you might fall. I heard it then, and I still hear it now.

Dylan had a talent for distilling a lot of experience into one line.  The first line of “Queen Jane Approximately” goes:

When your mother sends back all your invitations

That line triggers a sense of weariness and alienation so complete it almost brings tears.  Every verse describes a new way for things to go completely wrong.  I was at a rock club one night listening to a group play African-influenced rock, when without warning they launched into this.  I knew what it was from the first chords, and somehow, striking without warning like that with no context, it was even more powerful.

So which one wins, songwriting or teaching?  Well, we didn’t resolve the debate, which will continue.

Advertisements

About guitarsophist

I'm a guitar-playing rhetorician professor.
This entry was posted in Music and Guitar, Rhetoric and teaching and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Songwriting versus Teaching

  1. jimsturges says:

    John–I read this after making a post about learning (in college) that I can’t write! You have the patience of Job to work toward that cascading effect, or you are simply able to find the small but great treasures that are there. And I guess songwriting, like all writing, can be very bad or very good.–Jim

  2. guitarsophist says:

    For me, teaching is about individual students. You design a course for the many, but each student responds in a different way, and how you react to those differences is important. If I had corrected that teacher when she said, “My students can’t do anything,” she might have been closed to further insight. Instead, she read the book and came to her own conclusions, which is far more powerful than anything a teacher can say. A lot of the best stuff happens in teaching moments where you are flying by instinct.

    That is why I am not too excited about electronic clickers that give you instant feedback about how they understand your lecture. That seems rhetorically bizarre, and it seems to be more about the teacher than the students. Just my take on it though.

    Having too much patience might actually be bad. Sometimes students are motivated to understand by the teacher’s obvious frustration.

    John

  3. jimsturges says:

    Good points. I see some parallels to psychotherapy, especially when you let the teacher figure it out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s